George Floyd Survivor of American Police Culture
The passing of George Floyd and the resulting preliminary of the cop who a jury later chose is liable for Floyd’s demise doesn’t address what police culture which truly is at the core of this issue. The official who britfox showed up in court resembled a sheep prompted butcher. He was the substitute.
One simply thinks about how often the official held down others similarly as Floyd was held.
Concerning the preliminary, the official was accused of second and third degree murder and homicide.
I can comprehend the homicide accusation since there was nothing purposeful about Floyd’s passing; however why accuse him of homicide. The official might be answerable for Floyd’s demise however that doesn’t be guaranteed to mean it was murder on the off chance that it was not purposeful.
I can’t help thinking that the official concerned has been made the substitute for all that is the matter with police culture in specific region of the US. It is simpler to make individual officials take care of their errors instead of the police association. Individuals commit errors and at times these mix-ups cause the demise of someone else.
Cops put their lives at risk consistently as they need to manage some genuine ratbags and on top of that risk winding up in jail in the event that they commit an error. Young fellows and ladies who are examining a vocation in policing need to reconsider entering this calling.
In the preliminary of Derek Chauvin the guard attempted to advance the contention that Floyd’s demise was brought about by some different option from the power applied to the casualty’s neck while the official was holding him down. I would have felt that contention was unessential since the official had zero desire to kill Floyd in any case.
It is even more an instance of death by misfortune as opposed to kill?
There was one more case in Minnesota where a police officer unintentionally shot a young fellow. She went to get her taser and taken out her weapon unintentionally. The aftereffect of this error was that the young fellow passed on. All things considered, the official was charged also.
It was a straightforward mix-up. very much like a deer tracker who coincidentally shoots and kills another deer tracker. It happens consistently in New Zealand. Similarly as with the cops in Minnesota, each case is treated on its benefits with charges laid as needs be, however a deer tracker who coincidentally kills one more is unquestionably not accused of homicide.
What I’m attempting to say is that the bar for accusing person of homicide in America is by all accounts very low.
In Florida around 2010 or 2011, nineteen-year-old Jennifer Mee consented to go out on the town with a young fellow she had reached on Facebook fully intent on looting him. Her two male companions endeavored to burglarize him and it was during this interaction the casualty was lethally shot. Under Florida regulation all members in a lethal burglary are similarly at fault for homicide regardless of whether the were straightforwardly engaged with the casualty.
Jennifer was encouraged to guard the charges however was ineffective and she was viewed as at fault for first degree murder and condemned to existence without the chance of parole. How can one legitimize such an extreme sentence when there are such countless brutal homicides committed that got a similar sentence; at times a lighter sentence.
Is this equity?